Get my next post the minute it drops.

Heading into 2026, any business still caught in this extended experimentation phase should treat itself as officially behind. The window to establish structural competitive advantages is closing. Future success depends less on chasing the latest model and much more on adopting a systemic, enterprise-wide approach.

The boardroom conversation around artificial intelligence has, until now, fixated on model capabilities and upfront licence fees. This narrow lens is proving dangerously inadequate. Across FTSE 350 companies and mid-market PLCs, a silent cost escalation is underway, one driven not by the AI models themselves but, by the context they consume. Every document ingested, every customer interaction logged, every agentic workflow executed: each carries a chain of token consumption,

Recent research by NBER economists suggests these AI agents in particular, could drive a "Coasean singularity," a point where transaction costs fall towards zero, radically reshaping how markets function. In essence, tasks like finding information, negotiating deals, and enforcing contracts which are traditionally costly frictions in commerce, may become nearly instantaneous and costless.

This article focuses on data and technology. It reflects what we are seeing inside real organisations. It adds balanced advice so you can act without buying into hype.

Most leadership teams cannot articulate which they are pursuing. Or worse, they pursue all three simultaneously without acknowledging the different cultural infrastructures each requires. Productivity demands training and enablement. Automation requires trust and transparent communication about displacement. Opportunity needs permission to experiment and tolerance for failure. When you try to do all three at once without cultural foundations, you get confusion, resistance, an

The next generation of consultants must be builders as well as thinkers. They need to understand how these systems perceive, decide, and evolve. They must know how to govern them, not just advise around them. That shift demands a new literacy, the ability to translate technical behaviour into business language. A good consultant should be able to explain why an agent made a choice, how feedback altered its reasoning, and what governance keeps it accountable.

How Can SME Leaders Successfully Implement AI? Exploring the 5 Stages of AI Adoption

Boards are meant to safeguard shareholder value. Executives are measured on margins, EBIT and resilience. AI influences each of these levers. To treat it as optional is to step away from the very responsibilities leaders are appointed to uphold.

Agents will be everywhere. The difference between a competitive edge and a costly mess will come down to your architecture and your discipline. Autonomy without governance is reckless. Governance without autonomy is pointless. Build both into the same system and you give your people a tool they can trust.

Complete guide to AI agents in 2025: 7 types explained with real enterprise examples. Learn the critical difference between autonomous agents and basic automation tools. Discover proven implementation strategies, common failure patterns, and ROI metrics from actual deployments. Essential reading for business leaders evaluating agentic AI for customer service, manufacturing, and workflow automation.

We built AIaaS to cut through that noise. To give business leaders a route to trustworthy, strategic, and fully supported deployment. No gimmicks. No drag-and-drop shortcuts. Just proper integration, business alignment, and long-term value.

Much like its predecessor, Shadow IT, Shadow AI refers to the deployment of AI tools without official approval or governance. This practice is rapidly outpacing strategic oversight, posing severe risks to organisational security, compliance, and operational efficiency.